[members-discuss] New charging model
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] New charging model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] A summary for Proposal for New RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Thomas Jacob
ripe-ncc-members-list at internet24.de
Tue Jul 10 13:53:18 CEST 2012
> If you get /22 it is 1024 addresses, substracting this and that > (devices, routers, servers) you can cover about 800 customers, each and > every one with own public IP. It means that you need to pay about 3 EUR > a year per customer. It is about 26 euro cents per month. That amount is > so ridicoulus, that you should spend more time expanding your network > than complaining about RIPE fees. If we agree to this reasoning, why not have a system where your fee is proportional to the amount of resources you are allocated? For obviously this is also true if you are a bigger company with more customers? If the argument is that you don't use 256 times as many RIPE resources if you have a /8 instead of a /16, one could always go for APNIC-style formulae: http://www.apnic.net/services/become-a-member/how-much-does-it-cost
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] New charging model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] A summary for Proposal for New RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]