This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] New charging model
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] New charging model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] New charging model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Luck
lists-ripe at c4inet.net
Tue Jul 10 12:19:59 CEST 2012
All, On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 05:43:17PM +0200, eifel-net GmbH wrote: >for us the new charging model seems to be unbalanced. Bigger LIR, as for >example big telcos (Deutsche Telekom in germany for example with lots of >ip-adresses in use) seem to pay much less for the service for each ipv4 the flat charging model is actually eminently forward-looking insofar as if ipv6 ever gets deployed, there should be reasonably little difference in the amount of allocations the LIRs hold. Now, if anyone wants to have another discussion on how to reign in budget inflation in the NCC, I'm game :) rgds, Sascha Luck
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] New charging model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] New charging model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]