This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] New charging model
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] New charging model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] New charging model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wolfgang Tremmel
wolfgang.tremmel at de-cix.net
Tue Jul 10 10:03:03 CEST 2012
Hello, On 09.07.2012, at 17:43, eifel-net GmbH wrote: > ip-adresses in use) seem to pay much less for the service for each ipv4 > they use, compared to small onces, as there is a fee-limit of aprox. 5000 you do not pay for addresses. you do not pay for addresses. Please write 500 times. > EUR yearly. For smaller companies the new model will be an increase in > cost, as the border to small as /22 is not high enough, so that they will > be billed as regular (thus 50% of big LIR!). Next problem is, that big LIR > may pick category "small" without beeing punished. working in customer support the reality is that the amount of support a company needs is independent of the size. Often smaller companies even need more support then the big ones. If you want to be a LIR you have to pay for it (it = the service). Otherwise get addresses from your upstream and be happy with it. I (as a private internet citizen) support the new model (although I think that self-assessment is not such a good idea). best regards, Wolfgang
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] New charging model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] New charging model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]