[members-discuss] New charging model
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] New charging model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] New charging model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Wolfgang Tremmel
wolfgang.tremmel at de-cix.net
Tue Jul 10 10:03:03 CEST 2012
Hello, On 09.07.2012, at 17:43, eifel-net GmbH wrote: > ip-adresses in use) seem to pay much less for the service for each ipv4 > they use, compared to small onces, as there is a fee-limit of aprox. 5000 you do not pay for addresses. you do not pay for addresses. Please write 500 times. > EUR yearly. For smaller companies the new model will be an increase in > cost, as the border to small as /22 is not high enough, so that they will > be billed as regular (thus 50% of big LIR!). Next problem is, that big LIR > may pick category "small" without beeing punished. working in customer support the reality is that the amount of support a company needs is independent of the size. Often smaller companies even need more support then the big ones. If you want to be a LIR you have to pay for it (it = the service). Otherwise get addresses from your upstream and be happy with it. I (as a private internet citizen) support the new model (although I think that self-assessment is not such a good idea). best regards, Wolfgang
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] New charging model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] New charging model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]