This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Proposal for New RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Proposal for New RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Proposal for New RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jochem de Ruig
jochem at ripe.net
Mon Jul 9 19:28:29 CEST 2012
On Jul 9, 2012, at 4:24 PM, Nigel Titley wrote: > On 09/07/2012 15:00, Frank Louwers wrote: >> On 9 Jul 2012, at 15:23, Nigel Titley wrote: >> >> Dear Nigel, >> >> What would prevent a large LIR from picking "small" each year? Are you counting on shame and blame? > > Yes indeed. Membership categories will be published. > >> >> How much % of the members is (currently) Small? As I have the impression it does get more expensive for them! > > Jochem can produce the actual figures and I'm sure he will. > Currently about 50% of the members is in the Small category. These are the membership figures per 30 June 2012: Extra Small: 2,241 Small: 4,071 Medium: 1,461 Large: 290 Extra Large: 72 Total: 8,135 Regards, Jochem > All the best > > Nigel > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 1735 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20120709/e31c7bf7/attachment.p7s>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Proposal for New RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Proposal for New RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]