[members-discuss] Proposal for New RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Proposal for New RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Proposal for New RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jochem de Ruig
jochem at ripe.net
Mon Jul 9 19:28:29 CEST 2012
On Jul 9, 2012, at 4:24 PM, Nigel Titley wrote: > On 09/07/2012 15:00, Frank Louwers wrote: >> On 9 Jul 2012, at 15:23, Nigel Titley wrote: >> >> Dear Nigel, >> >> What would prevent a large LIR from picking "small" each year? Are you counting on shame and blame? > > Yes indeed. Membership categories will be published. > >> >> How much % of the members is (currently) Small? As I have the impression it does get more expensive for them! > > Jochem can produce the actual figures and I'm sure he will. > Currently about 50% of the members is in the Small category. These are the membership figures per 30 June 2012: Extra Small: 2,241 Small: 4,071 Medium: 1,461 Large: 290 Extra Large: 72 Total: 8,135 Regards, Jochem > All the best > > Nigel > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 1735 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20120709/e31c7bf7/attachment.p7s>
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Proposal for New RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Proposal for New RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Model
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]