This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Surprise on renew fees
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Surprise on renew fees
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] whois mntner
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sven Olaf Kamphuis
sven at cb3rob.net
Fri Feb 17 00:19:34 CET 2012
maybe it's time for ripe to send a letter by registered mail addressed -personally- to the chairman of the board of any big multinational company that it's time for them too to move onto ipv6 and set up a task-force to roll it out ASAP, as i'm under the impression that the dusty nerds at the noc did not make it clear enough to the management (years ago) that this HAS to be done ASAP and will cost them a few million euros somehow i think that in management terms "ipv6 is somethign they have read about in the news papers" but don't really see that its REQUIRED to stay in business very soon. they will then hire all kinds of expensive consultants which will get them to upgrade their stuff, as large multinationals always do, but at least things will get moving. there seems to be a lot of mis-communication about the "urgency" of the thing, if we end up with an internet where 1/3rd of it is ipv4 only, 1/3rd is dual stack and 1/3rd is ipv6 only, it's pretty much worthless. (and the ipv4 only part is going to lose their business sooner rather than later ;) no AAAA records for www.deutsche-bank.de and www.abnamro.nl don't tell me they don't have the cash to buy a few new routers or hire a consultant tomorrow :P etc. -- Greetings, Sven Olaf Kamphuis, CB3ROB Ltd. & Co. KG ========================================================================= Address: Koloniestrasse 34 VAT Tax ID: DE267268209 D-13359 Registration: HRA 42834 B BERLIN Phone: +31/(0)87-8747479 Germany GSM: +49/(0)152-26410799 RIPE: CBSK1-RIPE e-Mail: sven at cb3rob.net ========================================================================= <penpen> C3P0, der elektrische Westerwelle http://www.facebook.com/cb3rob ========================================================================= Confidential: Please be advised that the information contained in this email message, including all attached documents or files, is privileged and confidential and is intended only for the use of the individual or individuals addressed. Any other use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, hakan hn. nebioglu wrote: > up to now.. > i have never spoken... > i do now...!!! > this guys are working at the edge.. > it must be hot on the side of the sun... > ip addresses getting low. > and nobody concieve ip 6... > it is a hard world...or whatever.. > > i WILL pay my price.. > and i advice u must do the same.. > > thanks ripe.tahnks for everything...... > ps:i am 50 years old..pls stand stiil...and be thankfull.... > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "James Blessing" <jblessing at llnw.com> > To: members-discuss at ripe.net > Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 12:32:47 PM > Subject: Re: [members-discuss] Surprise on renew fees > > On 14/12/2011 09:27, Manfred F. Schramm wrote: > >> You can tend to the opinion 'once claimed always claimed', no new monetary assessment. >> You can also tend to the opinion 'each loaned IP-Range is to be regarded equally, whether newly assigned or assigned years ago'. >> >> What i can understand is some members 'feeling', the elder members did some 'protection of establishment'. > > The proposed (and counter proposed) fee structures for 2012 did try and > address this by taking out the time limitations but the membership (or > at least those that voted) did not believe that the final proposed fee > structure was acceptable and therefore the 2011 one was re-used. > > The NCC board (I believe) have taken these views on board and are > looking to propose a new structure for 2013 that addresses this issue, > tries to tie membership fees to 'size' more accurately and also provides > a fully costed breakdown of the individual elements in the activity plan > for 2013. They will also have to take into account the tax implications > of changing the charging structure. > > The membership will have plenty of time to read and respond to these > documents when published and vote on them next year. If you have strong > views or wish to publish your own ideas for a charging scheme I'm sure > the NCC board (and the rest of the membership) will be willing to > discuss them (or tear them to pieces as the mood dictates). > > J > > -- > James Blessing > +44 7989 039 476 > Strategic Relations Manager, EMEA > Limelight Networks > > ---- > If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss > mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page: > https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/view > > Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses. > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > > ---- > If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss > mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page: > https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/view > > Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses. >
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Surprise on renew fees
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] whois mntner
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]