This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] why is it proving impossible to gain IP sapce
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] why is it proving impossible to gain IP sapce
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] why is it proving impossible to gain IP sapce
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sven Olaf Kamphuis
sven at cb3rob.net
Thu Feb 16 17:49:07 CET 2012
ofcourse every access provider could ditch ipv4 -right now- with the following mechanism: 1: take a /96 of your own ipv6 space 2: translate this 1:1 to the entire ipv4 address space (dos boxes with packet driver and some assembly/c code, modified linux kernel, programmable logic arrays in a hardware implementation, whatever) (ask any dude with experience in kernel/assembly programming in your company to code that stuff, its not that hard, normal LACP/803ad over 8 or so of these "bridges/translators" should spread the load just fine if it needs to be more than 1 or 10ge in one go ;) (as the mtu of ipv6 is 1280, ofcourse the tcpmss should be adjusted and DF cleared incoming and outgoing on the ipv4 end ;) 3: code a dns resolver that translates the A requests into AAAA answers (and passes on the AAAA requests unmodified to a normal one ;) 4: ??? 5: profit! only thing that won't work are protocols that don't support ipv6 because they are a seperate program that didn't implement it yet. so if you REALLY cannot get ipv4 anymore and need space for your customers and still want to give them the full internet, this is the way to go ;) if you're going to NAT them anyway, you might as well NAT them from ipv6 to the old ipv4 stuff (instead of ipv4->ipv4 ;) i don't see any out of the box solutions on the market, specificially for the "dns part" tho. for content providers, indeed, the loadbalancers should be able to deal with the "gatewaying" part just fine, nothing to change there on the actual servers. it's not exactly rocket science ppl, get on with it. -- Greetings, Sven Olaf Kamphuis, CB3ROB Ltd. & Co. KG ========================================================================= Address: Koloniestrasse 34 VAT Tax ID: DE267268209 D-13359 Registration: HRA 42834 B BERLIN Phone: +31/(0)87-8747479 Germany GSM: +49/(0)152-26410799 RIPE: CBSK1-RIPE e-Mail: sven at cb3rob.net ========================================================================= <penpen> C3P0, der elektrische Westerwelle http://www.facebook.com/cb3rob ========================================================================= Confidential: Please be advised that the information contained in this email message, including all attached documents or files, is privileged and confidential and is intended only for the use of the individual or individuals addressed. Any other use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. On Thu, 16 Feb 2012, Brandon Butterworth wrote: >> Google: chinese olympics ipv6 > > google UK olympics ipv6 > >> Happened in 2008 nuff said > > not happening in 2012, really lame (not just BBC site) > >> Every large site today being served by load balancers today can turn on ipv6 > > I know, we can, I had it running for v6 day. If we'd started a year ago > it could have been in the plan for this June but Vint said 2013 and no > other announcements were made until Jan. Too late, ops had already > decided making it production wasn't high enough up their list until of > stuff that really must work for the Olympics. > > Tough, would have been good to do. > > brandon > > ---- > If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss > mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page: > https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/view > > Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses. >
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] why is it proving impossible to gain IP sapce
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] why is it proving impossible to gain IP sapce
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]