This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] A Whim about next year's fees
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] A Whim about next year's fees
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] A Whim about next year's fees
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
lir at elisa.fi
lir at elisa.fi
Tue Feb 14 08:37:03 CET 2012
Well, it seems to start again, the discussion on the fees. We have not heard too much from Nigels taskforce team that is supposed to propose some new ideas, therefore i decided to write one. I personally wonder when we will be charged based on using IPv6. Most LIRs use a /32 and some use multiple /32, since we all agree that IPv4 is running out, should we start to look into the future and not into the past? (how do we charge new lirs when v4 has run out)... If you want to change the charging scheme, the time to include ipv6 is probably now. To save you all from difficult schemes, if you have a lot of IPv4 or if you have a little because you started later, all together a /32 v6 and a random amount of IPv4 will not have a huge percentage difference in IP:s compared to your /32. After all most who want to change the charging scheme are after charging by ip, per ip, or in percentage... So my basic idea is to develope a charging scheme that is based on IPv6, and not on IPv4. After all a currently "small" or "extra small" LIR gets a /32 as well, so the total amount of IP:s in the end doesn't differ that much in percentage. So a basic fee for the basic v6 space (a /32)(always, the same for everyone), a little variable addition for the old IPv4 space , and a a little addition for every(?) multiple /32. Cheers, Ray On Mon, 13 Feb 2012, KOSMOZZ - Info wrote: > Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:26:05 +0000 > From: KOSMOZZ - Info <info at kosmozz.be> > To: Lu Heng <h.lu at anytimechinese.com>, > "members-discuss at ripe.net" <members-discuss at ripe.net> > Subject: Re: [members-discuss] A Whim about next year's fees > > > Hi Lu, > > > > I was thinking the same. Why shouldn?t we all be billed for the amount we are using and may?be pay a fee for the > amount that has been reserved and not used? > > I?ll take this with me to the Taskforce currently brainstorming on Billing matters. > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Filip Herman > > filip at kosmozz.be > > > > KOSMOZZ -- http://www.kosmozz.be > | Member of Internet Service Providers Belgium (http://www.ispa.be) > > > > > > > > Van: members-discuss-bounces at ripe.net [mailto:members-discuss-bounces at ripe.net] Namens Lu Heng > Verzonden: maandag 13 februari 2012 18:44 > Aan: members-discuss at ripe.net > Onderwerp: [members-discuss] A Whim about next year's fees > > > > Hi Colleagues: > > > > Just had a whim about next year's membership fees, since Ripe will almost certain running out this year, why shouldn't > we divided the membership fees as the percentage of the total recourse we have?(mostly IPv4) > > > > The total amount of Ripe's IPv4 is known, and by end of this year, the total amount of each LIR's IPv4 is known as > well. > > > > So why should we just simpy do a math as LIR total amount address(L)/Ripe's total amount of address(R)*100%*Ripe's > total need(TN)=Lir's yearly contribution(C) > > > > So make the format simple: > > > > C=(L/R*100%)*TN > > > > Then I think it is "real fair". And as calculate the member fee based on the share of member in the organization's > recourse's, it doesn't imply as "selling IP" rumor which has been the main reason we have categories rather than real > fair solutions. > > > > How you think, my colleagues, and this is just my 2 cents thought. > > > > -- > -- > Kind regards. > Lu > > This transmission is intended solely for the addressee(s) shown above. > It may contain information that is privileged, confidential or > otherwise protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use > of this transmission or its contents by persons other than the > intended addressee(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received > this transmission in error, please notify this office immediately and > e-mail the original at the sender's address above by replying to this > message and including the text of the transmission received. > > > -- ************************************************************ Raymond Jetten Phone: +358 3 41024 139 Senior System Specialist Fax: +358 3 41024 199 Elisa Oyj / Network Management Mobile: +358 45 6700 139 Hermiankatu 3A raymond.jetten at elisa.fi FIN-33720, TAMPERE http://www.elisa.fi ************************************************************
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] A Whim about next year's fees
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] A Whim about next year's fees
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]