[members-discuss] budget 2012

Hello everybody,

 

>From the counts it seems that the "not much increase" paradigm is not in the intentions of the new charging scheme. While I'd prefer to see the numbers in percents of amount to pay, the counting shows - the new charging scheme is way off the initial good feeling. (I hope the counting are fair - i.e. includes independent resources like PI and ASN).

 

I'd like also hear some words  from RIPE NCC about several suggestions voiced in the list.

 

Regards,

Vladislav Potapov

Ru.iiat

 

 

From: members-discuss-bounces at ripe.net [mailto:members-discuss-bounces at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Jochem de Ruig
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 6:18 PM
To: Nigel Titley; members-discuss at ripe.net
Subject: Re: [members-discuss] budget 2012

 

Dear all,

 

About 40% of members will pay less and about 60% of members will pay more.

 

Pay less in EUR

	
less than 1,000

0%

1,000 - 500

9%

499 - 0

31%


Pay more

	
1 - 499

32%

500 - 999

3%

1,000 - 1,999

19%

2,000 - 5,000

4%

more than 5,000

1%

 

Regards,

 

 

Jochem

 

 

On Oct 12, 2011, at 6:24 PM, Nigel Titley wrote:





On 12/10/2011 13:56, Mike Hollowell wrote:



On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 13:30 +0100, Nigel Titley wrote:

	 

	30% of XSmall members moving up, 9% of XSmall members moving down.

	59% of Small members moving up, 14% Small members moving down.

	100% M, L&  XL moving up.

	 

	Doesn't look the least bit balanced, roughly or otherwise.

	 

I did talk about the costs and not the membership category. Let me see if Jochem can give us some figures on what percentage of members will see *cost* increase and decrease.

Nigel

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20111018/59f14ffe/attachment.html>