[members-discuss] budget 2012
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] budget 2012
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] budget 2012
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mike Hollowell
mike at theinternet.org.uk
Wed Oct 12 14:56:13 CEST 2011
On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 13:30 +0100, Nigel Titley wrote: > The intention of the new charging scheme was not to increase the per > member costs in any substantial way. True, the budget has increased but > so have the number of members so the per member cost should not have > substantially changed. However in any change to the charging scheme > there are going to be winners and losers. We calculated that the numbers > of members who saw an increase would be roughly balanced by those who > saw a decrease. I suspect that we are unlikely to hear from the ones who > see a decrease. 30% of XSmall members moving up, 9% of XSmall members moving down. 59% of Small members moving up, 14% Small members moving down. 100% M, L & XL moving up. Doesn't look the least bit balanced, roughly or otherwise. Mike ---- If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page: https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/view Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses.
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] budget 2012
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] budget 2012
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]