This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] budget 2012
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] budget 2012
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] budget 2012
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Larisa Yurkina
ula at ripn.net
Wed Oct 12 09:26:34 CEST 2011
poty at iiat.ru wrote, 11.10.2011 19:03: Hi everybody, > Then - could you explain - why my question about why selling ASN per-number is not violating the current policy was not answered? Or you would deny this question too? > > I attended that GM and do confirm that the question asked by Vladislav did not get answer. Someone of Executive Board members replied that the question was really serious and the problem should be thought out carefully. But it never happened. Which brings us again to the core problem of the RIPE NCC billing - whether we pay for number of resources or registration service itselff.While IPs could be calculated easily, the registration work have no clear measurement accuracy. So, when prices go up sharply people start bothering "what for?", so do I. >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Richard Hartmann [mailto:richih.mailinglist at gmail.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 6:54 PM >> To: Potapov Vladislav >> Cc: gert at space.net; bangert at parknet.dk; members-discuss at ripe.net >> Subject: Re: [members-discuss] budget 2012 >> >> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 16:32, <poty at iiat.ru> wrote: >> >> >>> It IS true. Several people can prove that. The answer of the RIPE NCC >>> was - it is already late to change something. The presentation was >>> forged - and personally you knew that. >>> >> While Gert did a good job of dismantling your factual points, I would >> like to add a more personal/netiquette note. >> >> If you feel that you absolutely _have_ to accuse someone not only of >> lying but of deliberate manipulation, please have some specific, >> verifiable facts at the ready to back up your claim. In this specific >> case, I highly doubt you have any. >> >> 2007-01 has been discussed at length prior to its voting. Coming late >> to the game is not an excuse to pretend your voice was ignored on >> purpose. >> >> >> Richard >> > > > ---- > If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss > mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page: > https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/view > > Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses. > With respect, -- Larisa Yurkina RosNIIROS tel: +7(495)737-0604 fax: +7(495)737-0684 ---- If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page: https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/view Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses.
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] budget 2012
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] budget 2012
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]