[members-discuss] budget 2012
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] budget 2012
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] budget 2012
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Xavier Llongueras
xavier.llongueras at infojobs.net
Tue Oct 11 16:56:39 CEST 2011
It´s possible not receive any mail from RIPPE ?? It´s a very fucky spam !!! Thanks -----Mensaje original----- De: members-discuss-bounces at ripe.net [mailto:members-discuss-bounces at ripe.net] En nombre de poty at iiat.ru Enviado el: martes, 11 de octubre de 2011 16:49 Para: gert at space.net CC: bangert at parknet.dk; members-discuss at ripe.net Asunto: Re: [members-discuss] budget 2012 Yes, it is voted for, but what was the words preceding the vote? In the slides there were many "proves" that the current scheme is a catastrophe (which was a complete lie, because the current scheme didn't use the right factors in the presentation intentionally - after the presentation we discussed the matter and many RIPE NCC members agreed that) and if we didn't vote for new scheme the world would die completely. :) I know also that there was big lobby in the GM. As soon as there was voting - nothing could be done against it, but many people know - the intention of the decision was bad! Regards, Vladislav Potapov > -----Original Message----- > From: Gert Doering [mailto:gert at space.net] > Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 6:38 PM > To: Potapov Vladislav > Cc: gert at space.net; bangert at parknet.dk; members-discuss at ripe.net > Subject: Re: [members-discuss] budget 2012 > > Hi, > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 06:32:00PM +0400, poty at iiat.ru wrote: > > It IS true. Several people can prove that. The answer of the RIPE NCC > > was - it is already late to change something. The presentation was > > forged - and personally you knew that. > > I was there, and the change of the charging scheme was discussed for > *three* consecutive meetings, and it was voted for, and received the > majority of votes. > > The change to per-piece billing for PI and AS is came with the adoption > of 2007-01 and had nothing to do whatsoever with increasing the budget > (which it didn't, the LIR categories and fees were adjusted to make > this neutral in regards to the overall budget). > > Of course there are people that do not like any change that will > directly affect their business model (getting lots of PI for free and > selling for > money) - and this is why the change was announced well in advance, and > voted for(!). > > Gert Doering > -- NetMaster > -- > have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? > > SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard > Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner- > Culemann > D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) > Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 ---- If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page: https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/view Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses. ---- If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page: https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/view Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses.
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] budget 2012
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] budget 2012
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]