[members-discuss] budget 2012

Dear Richard,
You can look at the presentation by himself. It IS a fact of lie! The "current scheme" was not adopted for rising expenses while the other schemes - was. If you CAN read right - I'm not accusing Gert in the decision (it was not his decision anyway)- just in wrong position in the presenting of the possibilities.

Regards,
Vladislav Potapov

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Hartmann [mailto:richih.mailinglist at gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 6:54 PM
> To: Potapov Vladislav
> Cc: gert at space.net; bangert at parknet.dk; members-discuss at ripe.net
> Subject: Re: [members-discuss] budget 2012
> 
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 16:32,  <poty at iiat.ru> wrote:
> 
> > It IS true. Several people can prove that. The answer of the RIPE NCC
> > was - it is already late to change something. The presentation was
> > forged - and personally you knew that.
> 
> While Gert did a good job of dismantling your factual points, I would
> like to add a more personal/netiquette note.
> 
> If you feel that you absolutely _have_ to accuse someone not only of
> lying but of deliberate manipulation, please have some specific,
> verifiable facts at the ready to back up your claim. In this specific
> case, I highly doubt you have any.
> 
> 2007-01 has been discussed at length prior to its voting. Coming late
> to the game is not an excuse to pretend your voice was ignored on
> purpose.
> 
> 
> Richard


----
If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss
mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page:
https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/view

Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses.