This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] Yet Another Proposal for the Charging Scheme 2012
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Yet Another Proposal for the Charging Scheme 2012
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Yet Another Proposal for the Charging Scheme 2012
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
sergey myasoedov
kaa at net-art.cz
Thu Oct 6 11:39:41 CEST 2011
Due to legal form (non-profit), RIPE NCC made some tricks to avoid corporate tax. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_tax_in_the_Netherlands Did the financial department perform the tax predictions in case of applicable corporate tax? You wrote Thursday, October 6, 2011, 11:33:22 AM: >> Regarding the charging scheme, as I understood the RIPE NCC was interested in a "per IP" >> billing base, but this can't be done easily without risk due to tax issues. > What tax issues are those? -- Kind regards, sergey myasoedov
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Yet Another Proposal for the Charging Scheme 2012
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Yet Another Proposal for the Charging Scheme 2012
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]