[members-discuss] Yet Another Proposal for the Charging Scheme 2012

On 06.10.2011 12:34 , Michiel Klaver wrote:
> So, you first suggest a basic member fee to avoid billing per IP, but 
> then you move to a scheme where you actually suggest fees per block of 
> IP addresses. Tell me, how is this not billing per ip? It still looks 
> like RIPE will be 'selling' amounts of IP addresses, grouped in 
> blocks. And selling 'products' has to be taxed.
As Nigel wrote, the issues is that the RIPE NCC need to have *Members* 
to keep its status within the tax authorities.

It's the *exact* same model as we have already with IPv4-PI. You pay 
your category fee and additional per each IPv4-PI resource.
With my proposal we would have all the same category and also get billed 
for each PA resource.

Cheers,
Sven

--
Sven Wiese
CEO

I.C.S. "Trabia-Network" S.R.L.
[t] +373 (22) 844-844
[e] s.wiese at trabia.net <mailto:s.wiese at trabia.net>
[i] www.trabia.net <http://www.trabia.net>

Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If 
you are not in the addresses indicated in this message (or responsible 
for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver 
this message to anyone. In such a case, you should destroy this message 
and kindly notify the sender by reply e-mail.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/attachments/20111006/d71adadd/attachment.html>