This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] Fwd: Re: budget 2012
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [#17618] Re: [Ticket#2011100501001154] Proposed 2012 Charging scheme, Board comments
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Fwd: Re: budget 2012
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at efes.iucc.ac.il
Thu Oct 6 10:59:45 CEST 2011
>
>At 12:19 05/10/2011 -0300, SPEEDNIC S.R.L. - RIPE Handling wrote:
>>One big point is that the personnel expenses will growing up by 6,3%
>>!?!?! I don't guess that each one will get more money at this amount.
>>But why we need that high increase - more personnel maybe - but why ??
>>The work at RIPE will be the same as before without needing more
>>personnel because LIR can be waiting without problem like one day longer
>>for some requests too - isn't it ?
>>
>>General Operating Expenses +10,8% ??? It is a joke not ?
>
>Ask yourself, why no one from RIPE has over the past week added to the
>discussion here with the reasons and justifications for why they need to
>increase their budget.
>
>-Hank
>
>
>>Best regards,
>> Alexander Schoberl
>> SPEEDNIC S.R.L.
Also note that the 9% increased budget is not up for voting. The only
thing up for voting is the charging scheme. The 19MEuro budget is fait
accompli.
-Hank
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] [#17618] Re: [Ticket#2011100501001154] Proposed 2012 Charging scheme, Board comments
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Fwd: Re: budget 2012
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]