This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] FW: NCC acting on registrations pursuant to "police order"?
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] FW: NCC acting on registrations pursuant to "police order"?
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] FW: NCC acting on registrations pursuant to "police order"?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Brandon Butterworth
brandon at rd.bbc.co.uk
Fri Nov 11 16:11:26 CET 2011
>> 1 Each Party shall adopt such legislative and other measures as >> may be necessary to enable its competent authorities to order or >> similarly obtain the expeditious preservation of specified computer >> data It's just preservation, it doesn't say prevention of new data creation (you'd have to preserve that too) It would just be a limitation of the RIPE systems if they have to lock an account to ensure retention of data, they could implement other means to provide a preserved data trail while leaving the account active. brandon
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] FW: NCC acting on registrations pursuant to "police order"?
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] FW: NCC acting on registrations pursuant to "police order"?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]