This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] NCC acting on registrations pursuant to "police order"?
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] NCC acting on registrations pursuant to"police order"?
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] NCC acting on registrations pursuant to "police order"?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Florian Weimer
fweimer at bfk.de
Fri Nov 11 11:03:26 CET 2011
* Sascha Luck: > in the recent discussion on RPKI, it was stated > by the NCC that it would not act on resource > registrations (and, by extension, certificates and > ROAs) without a valid Dutch court order. And in the RPKI context, it was said that there was no legal basis whatsoever that such an order could be obtained *at all*. I'm not sure this is a bad development. It shows that existing laws and RIPE policies allow government agencies and RIPE NCC to work together, in order to make the Internet a safer place. It is difficult for me to see how we could address such situations without any government interference whatsoever, merely through self-regulation, and still maintain due process for those who are involved. -- Florian Weimer <fweimer at bfk.de> BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/ Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1 D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] NCC acting on registrations pursuant to"police order"?
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] NCC acting on registrations pursuant to "police order"?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]