This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] NCC acting on registrations pursuant to"police order"?
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] NCC acting on registrations pursuant to "police order"?
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] NCC acting on registrations pursuant to"police order"?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jørgen Hovland
jorgen at ssc.net
Fri Nov 11 12:07:02 CET 2011
On 11/11/11 09:34, Axel Pawlik wrote: > Good morning Sascha, all, > > you are right Sascha, this is an order from the Dutch > police, on behalf of the Distract Attorney. > > If we were to refuse it, according to counsel, we > would become liable for consequences of that. > I'm expecting further information today as to > which further consequences a refusal would have. > If you don't mind, I have a question: First of all, did you receive any real reason why they requested this? If not, I find that decision disturbing. As opposed to other things in the RIPE NCC budget, the potential expenses for pursuing this is something I would gladly accept. When you permit things like that it is damaging the reputation. Cheers, J
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] NCC acting on registrations pursuant to "police order"?
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] NCC acting on registrations pursuant to"police order"?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]