This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] Surprise on renew fees
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] {Spam?} RE: Surprise on renew fees
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Surprise on renew fees
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nigel Titley
nigel at titley.com
Fri Dec 16 17:59:22 CET 2011
On 14/12/11 18:40, Carlos Friacas wrote: > On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Nigel Titley wrote: > >>> Which is the reason? There was a public vote with a public result? >> Yes. The charging scheme is always voted on by the membership, every >> year. > Hello, > > I've been a bit far from these issues, but as far as i understood, the > charging scheme wasn't directly voted upon by members, right? > Members voted on the Yearly Budget, and the charging scheme is just a > subset of that, correct? > It was not possible to approve the charging scheme, and at the same time > (with a different cast of votes) reject the Budget, right? > No, the members only vote on the charging scheme, they don't vote on the budget. The members *used* to vote on and approve the budget but they voluntarily and pretty near unanimously voted to give up this power several years ago. Nigel
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] {Spam?} RE: Surprise on renew fees
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Surprise on renew fees
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]