[members-discuss] New Charging Scheme

I like the "v6 or die" approach, time for a shakeout :P

we can get rid of all the clueless "competitors" (mostly owned by the 
MAFIAA anyway ;) in one day, by shutting down ipv4 :P

bye bye time warner telecom etc :P

On Fri, 5 Aug 2011, Brandon Butterworth wrote:

>> regarding the ipv4 address space, we've actually tried to announce some
>> e-class space over the past days, appearantly, most, if not all, routers
>> filter it.
>
> Interesting, but doesn't matter, v4 is dead, get over it (as you
> eloquently explained previously)
>
>> furthermore, we've found a bunch of legacy ranges, which are not
>> announced at all, so if the DoD and IBM would be kind enough to hand
>> them over to ARIN/IANA, that would be appreciated
>
> No, that'd just give people an excuse to put off v6 for even longer.
>
> v6 or die.
>
>> don't see why "the prudential insurance company of america" would need an
>> /8, clearly they don't see the point of it themselves either, as they
>> don't announce a single ip out of it :P
>
> You're not allocating it to them so it doesn't matter what point
> you see.
>
> Back when it may have been of use I agreed, space allocated for non
> internet use could have been considered a different non overlapping
> realm and the entire space used on the internet regardless of any
> private allocations for non internet use. However that wasn't how it
> was chosen to be done and again it no longer matters as it's history
> now.
>
> brandon
>