This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] idea Christian 'wiwi' Wittenhorst
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] idea Christian 'wiwi' Wittenhorst
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] idea Christian 'wiwi' Wittenhorst
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marcel Edler (Optimate-Server.de)
medler at optimate-server.de
Wed Aug 3 20:38:58 CEST 2011
Hi Jørgen, > Paying for an "object" in a "database" is kindof silly as there are > little or no expenses related to a database itself these days. If it > would be up to me I would get 1x /18 instead of 2x /19 in the > beginning, > but RIPE NCC didn't approve on that. I shouldn't be punished because I > am "saving" resources by using /19s instead of a /18 which was forced > upon me by RIPE NCC. 2x/19 are equivalent to 1x/18 -> 2132 Euro I have 1x/17, 2x/18, 1x/19 and its little bit more than /16, so I have to pay for /15 -> 3562 Euro PI-Space should not count in this Charging Scheme, it should costs 50 Euro/year like now. AS 50Euro/year too. Regards, Marcel Edler
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] idea Christian 'wiwi' Wittenhorst
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] idea Christian 'wiwi' Wittenhorst
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]