{Spam?} RE: [members-discuss] New Charging Scheme

As I remember the discussions the introduction of charging for PI was to
balance the XXS member alternative. What is the difference between a
customer with a PI and an XXS member? If you charge for one should you not
charge for the other and since you cannot charge the user of the PI you
charge the LIR who allocates it

-----Original Message-----
From: members-discuss-admin at ripe.net [mailto:members-discuss-admin at ripe.net]
On Behalf Of Rob Evans
Sent: 02 August 2011 11:06
To: Paolo Prandini
Cc: members-discuss at ripe.net
Subject: Re: [members-discuss] New Charging Scheme

Paolo, Patrick,

I may be missing something here from nothing more than a quick scan of the
document, but where does it say that all PI users must be members of the
RIPE NCC?

It mentions Direct Assignment Users, but aren't those are the chaps that
already have a direct contract with the NCC under 2007-01?  What prohibits
the current setup of a "sponsoring LIR?"

Best,
Rob

---- 
If you don't want to receive mails from the RIPE NCC Members Discuss list,
please log in to your LIR Portal account at: http://lirportal.ripe.net/
First click on General and then click on Edit.
At the bottom of the page you can add or remove addresses. 
-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1390 / Virus Database: 1518/3805 - Release Date: 08/02/11