This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd)
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd)
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Owen DeLong
owen at delong.com
Mon Mar 1 19:42:52 CET 2010
On Mar 1, 2010, at 11:55 PM, Adam Waite wrote: > >> Hm, I was under the impression that ARPANET was a government run >> network... >> >> > Not since 1992......what you're looking for these days is NIPRnet and SIPRnet, and ESnet, etc, etc, etc. > > ARPANET only lives on in reverse dns..... > > Um, actually, I would say that in all of those cases, including ARPANET when it existed, you are dealing with a government sponsored network rather than a government run network. Generally, in each of those cases, the government provides some or all of the money to keep the network going, but, has very little to do with dictating policy or operational aspects of the network. Owen
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd)
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]