This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd)
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd)
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ron Broersma
ron at nosc.mil
Mon Mar 1 18:49:50 CET 2010
On Mar 1, 2010, at 9:25 AM, Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu wrote: > On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 16:42:15 +0100, Arjan van der Oest said: > >>> (considering the fact that governments themselves are not capable of >>> running anything but a gray-cheese-with-a-dial telephone network >> >> Hm, I was under the impression that ARPANET was a government run >> network... > > And let's face it - the Arpa/Milnet was a test network, not a production > network. It may have started as a research network, but was very much used for production activities by late 70's and early 80's. --Ron (Site coordinator for Arpanet IMP #3)
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd)
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Re: RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group (fwd)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]