This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at efes.iucc.ac.il
Mon Jun 22 06:14:18 CEST 2009
At 09:52 PM 21-06-09 +0100, Martin List-Petersen wrote: >Max Tulyev wrote: > > Martin, > > > > Votes can be done as PGP signed e-mails. These e-mails can be published > > on web site or sent to all interesting people via e-mail. So everyone > > can check their votes are counted right. As anybody can check PGP signs, > > it is not a problem voting through RIPE NCC web site. > > > > P.S. Remember the board elections: people put ballots inside a hat, then > > a few guys went out with the hat, did something (probably counted > > ballots) and said the result. So the current voting system already not > > better than voting through the LIR portal ;) > > >Well, >they didn't leave. They were in the back of the room. > >But yes, any online voting system will > >a) give more people a chance to vote > >and > >b) be more precise > > >I just stated by personal preference and reasoning. Do what you want >from there :) I know what I'm voting for, if it comes up to a vote. Problem is it will probably brought for a vote at the next AGM where it will be defeated since the 50 LIRs who attend probably won't want their vote diluted by the unwashed masses. -Hank
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]