[members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Max Tulyev
president at ukraine.su
Fri Jun 19 20:32:13 CEST 2009
Sven, Sven Olaf Kamphuis wrote: > Instead of asking 50 euros per assignment per ??year/month/cow/whatever??, > it would make more sense to check if assignments are actually > announced and if they are not, delete them after 3 years or so. this is the key point. Visibility of any (including PA) network from $point_of_Internet is NOT a mandatory. Some PI is only from interconnecting N networks and not for global routing. And also, due to current Internet structure, you can't garant global reachability of any network. You can see it through looking glassess - "full view" size some times more than 10% different from LG to LG. > so this is a "solution" to a non-existing "problem".. If you know how to catch dead DAs other than recurring fee - where you was when 2007-01 was in discussion phase? > besides, anyone looked at their concept-contract? it's like 3 meters long! We have own contract for DAs, it is accepted by RIPE NCC hostmasters. It has only 4 pages. > our "contracts" are usually verbal and go like "we will register some PI > space for you, if you pay us EUR 2500 "Administration fee" for the work OMG! Our fee is 10 times less :) and 100 EUR annual as for the biggest case in 2010 charging scheme proposal. Anyone are welcome! =) Anyway, how you are catching your dead DAs, if any? -- WBR, Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253 at FIDO)
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]