[members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Martin List-Petersen
martin at airwire.ie
Fri Jun 19 18:10:32 CEST 2009
Tonnerre Lombard wrote: > That's perfectly fine with me (except that I think exceptions should be > made for organizations like SwissIX). I am merely suggesting that there > are going to be problems with the fact that these fees are also > going to be applied to existing assignments, and that "IP addresses are > not property" may not be the opinion a judge chooses to share. > > As I said before, the RIPE NCC is no legislative power. > > But I guess there really is no need to debate that, it's more like a > "sit back and watch" situation. No, actually, I think you are making a perfect point, that IXP ressources maybe should be excempt. But again, this could be raised as a proposal in the address working group and then pushed through as a seperate policy or addendum to 2007-01. Kind regards, Martin List-Petersen -- Airwire - Ag Nascadh Pobail an Iarthair http://www.airwire.ie Phone: 091-865 968
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]