This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[members-discuss] Re: [ncc-announce] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2010
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Re: [ncc-announce] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2010
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme draft again
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bernard Dugas
bernard.dugas.2009 at is-production.com
Thu Jul 23 00:36:02 CEST 2009
Dear Jochem, Jochem de Ruig wrote: >>Sorry, i may be unclear, i look for a table like this : >> >>Category ExtraSmall Small Medium Large eXtraLarge >>N° of AS >>N° of /19V4 >>N° of /20V4 >>N° of /21V4 >>N° of /22V4 >>N° of /30V6 >>N° of /31V6 >>N° of /32V6 >>N° of /33V6 > > I do not have a table like this available. The Charging Scheme is an > automated process and has as output mainly a score per registry. This > will require quite some manual work from our side. When this is very > relevant to discuss the Charging Scheme then this will be possible in > due time. I think this is very relevant to understand the current billing scheme that is quite complicated from my beginner point of view : What i understand is that there is a RessourceScore and a TimedScore : - RessourceScore is based on an arbitrary value corresponding to each ressource allocated or assigned to a member ; - TimedScore is a value computed from each RessourceScore by taking into account the age of the ressource allocation or assignation. Then, there is another function that make a classification of the members in 5 classes, that i imagine are carefully chosen by factors i don't know currently. But i don't forget that the basic goal of RIPE is to manage some scarce resources that are IP adresses and ASNumbers. So as i am told that this classification of members in 5 categories is important, i would like to know how the ressources are used by these 5 categories. I can also understand that categories are an artificial concept that is not important at all, and that would be a good explanation why there is currently no table showing use of ressources by categories. But then i would ask myself why using categories in billing scheme if they are not useful anywhere else ? > May be you can find the answer to your question from the readily > information at: > ftp://ftp.ripe.net/pub/stats/ripencc/delegated-ripencc-latest > This shows all the delegated resources from the RIPE NCC to its members. Thanks a lot for this link. This is interesting but miss the relationship side from each ressource to the category. Best regards, -- __Bernard DUGAS ______________________________________________________ | IS Production s.a. Innovative Solutions | | Technoparc Pays de Gex bernard.dugas.2009 at is-production.com | | 01633 ST GENIS POUILLY CEDEX - FRANCE - Mob.: +33 615 333 770 | | PLEASE NOTE NEW EMAIL ! ATTENTION NOUVEL EMAIL ! | |______________________________________________________________________|
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Re: [ncc-announce] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2010
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme draft again
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]