[members-discuss] Re: [ncc-announce] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2010
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Re: [ncc-announce] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2010
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme draft again
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bernard Dugas
bernard.dugas.2009 at is-production.com
Thu Jul 23 00:36:02 CEST 2009
Dear Jochem, Jochem de Ruig wrote: >>Sorry, i may be unclear, i look for a table like this : >> >>Category ExtraSmall Small Medium Large eXtraLarge >>N° of AS >>N° of /19V4 >>N° of /20V4 >>N° of /21V4 >>N° of /22V4 >>N° of /30V6 >>N° of /31V6 >>N° of /32V6 >>N° of /33V6 > > I do not have a table like this available. The Charging Scheme is an > automated process and has as output mainly a score per registry. This > will require quite some manual work from our side. When this is very > relevant to discuss the Charging Scheme then this will be possible in > due time. I think this is very relevant to understand the current billing scheme that is quite complicated from my beginner point of view : What i understand is that there is a RessourceScore and a TimedScore : - RessourceScore is based on an arbitrary value corresponding to each ressource allocated or assigned to a member ; - TimedScore is a value computed from each RessourceScore by taking into account the age of the ressource allocation or assignation. Then, there is another function that make a classification of the members in 5 classes, that i imagine are carefully chosen by factors i don't know currently. But i don't forget that the basic goal of RIPE is to manage some scarce resources that are IP adresses and ASNumbers. So as i am told that this classification of members in 5 categories is important, i would like to know how the ressources are used by these 5 categories. I can also understand that categories are an artificial concept that is not important at all, and that would be a good explanation why there is currently no table showing use of ressources by categories. But then i would ask myself why using categories in billing scheme if they are not useful anywhere else ? > May be you can find the answer to your question from the readily > information at: > ftp://ftp.ripe.net/pub/stats/ripencc/delegated-ripencc-latest > This shows all the delegated resources from the RIPE NCC to its members. Thanks a lot for this link. This is interesting but miss the relationship side from each ressource to the category. Best regards, -- __Bernard DUGAS ______________________________________________________ | IS Production s.a. Innovative Solutions | | Technoparc Pays de Gex bernard.dugas.2009 at is-production.com | | 01633 ST GENIS POUILLY CEDEX - FRANCE - Mob.: +33 615 333 770 | | PLEASE NOTE NEW EMAIL ! ATTENTION NOUVEL EMAIL ! | |______________________________________________________________________|
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Re: [ncc-announce] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2010
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Charging scheme draft again
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]