[members-discuss] Re: [members-discuss] gm-may2009/presentations/voting-options.pdf
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] gm-may2009/presentations/voting-options.pdf
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] gm-may2009/presentations/voting-options.pdf
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at efes.iucc.ac.il
Tue Jul 21 13:25:44 CEST 2009
At 11:10 21/07/2009 +0100, Nigel Titley wrote: >In all seriousness though. If you wish to open a discussion on the >election process, then this is the list to do it on. Note that the current >board has taken the step of encouraging the NCC to make announcements on >this list rather than just making them at general meetings. This is in >order to encourage open debate. I'm pleased to see that this is having >some effect. >... >>The result is that i have not voted until now, because i don't know >>anybody and the cost to go to the GM meeting is too high... >The proxy voting system allows you to vote remotely, but of course if you >don't know us then, as you say, a vote is pointless. How about the matter of electronic voting that I had raised previously? Why can't that be implemented? -Hank
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] gm-may2009/presentations/voting-options.pdf
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] gm-may2009/presentations/voting-options.pdf
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]