This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/
[LIR] Re: [members-discuss] Re: [ncc-announce] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2010
- Previous message (by thread): [LIR] Re: [members-discuss] Re: [ncc-announce] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2010
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Re: [ncc-announce] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2010
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andrea Cima
andrea at ripe.net
Thu Jul 16 17:14:21 CEST 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dear Gabriella, The approved policy "Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC" states: "This fourth version also argues that the proposal covers all End Users of provider independent number resources previously assigned either directly by the RIPE NCC or through a RIPE NCC Local Internet Registry. This proposal does not cover number resources marked in the RIPE Database as Early Registration (ERX) or NOT-SET. It also does not cover number resources listed in the RIPE Database which were assigned by InterNIC or assigned or allocated by other Regional Internet Registries." http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2007-01.html For this reason Early Registration (ERX) Internet number resources are not covered by this policy implementation. If you have any further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me. Kind regards, Andrea Cima RIPE NCC Gabriella Paolini wrote: > Dear Andrea, dear all, > maybe I missed something in the discussion. > I don't see any reference to Early Registration Transfer project objects. > Are PIs that were involved in ERX considered "orphaned" by default? > Or there is a place (they are not in LIR Portal resources) where I can > say "this is one of My End User" ? > Perhaps this should be a common problem for "old" LIR. > > Kind regards, > Gabriella Paolini > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: [LIR] Re: [members-discuss] Re: [ncc-announce] Draft RIPE NCC > Charging Scheme 2010 > From: Andrea Cima <andrea at ripe.net> > To: Hank Nussbacher <hank at efes.iucc.ac.il> > CC: members-discuss at ripe.net > Date: Giovedì 16 Luglio 2009 14.27.43 >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> >> Dear Hank, >> >> ... >> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.11 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkpfQ80ACgkQXOgsmPkFrjOj+wCggqiZqKSWBnCJcqAkYVVNsdiw dQoAoL9rxQDML9fpqDhrST1bqRnY+rA0 =EqLL -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message (by thread): [LIR] Re: [members-discuss] Re: [ncc-announce] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2010
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Re: [ncc-announce] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2010
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]