[members-discuss] Re: [ncc-announce] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2010
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Re: [ncc-announce] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2010
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Re: [ncc-announce] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2010
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bernard Dugas
bernard.dugas.2009 at is-production.com
Wed Aug 5 17:35:24 CEST 2009
Dear Jochem, Jochem de Ruig wrote: > Dear Bernard, > > To address you comments and questions I will approach you off line, this > will be more effective and interactive and to discuss the Charging > Scheme it is not necessary to address these questions on this mailing list. Concerning the questions on the file, i would gladly accept your help in private email. But answers will help me to provide an interesting analysis to all members. Concerning the question on why using billing categories, i think that this is the whole point of the charging scheme : why having billing categories in 1 case and not in the other ? What is the point of these categories ? I am sure that all members will be interested to know specially new and small members... Best regards, -- __Bernard DUGAS ______________________________________________________ | IS Production s.a. Innovative Solutions | | Technoparc Pays de Gex bernard.dugas.2009 at is-production.com | | 01633 ST GENIS POUILLY CEDEX - FRANCE - Mob.: +33 615 333 770 | | PLEASE NOTE NEW EMAIL ! ATTENTION NOUVEL EMAIL ! | |______________________________________________________________________|
- Previous message (by thread): [members-discuss] Re: [ncc-announce] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2010
- Next message (by thread): [members-discuss] Re: [ncc-announce] Draft RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2010
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]