[mat-wg] [routing-wg] RIPE Labs post: Does The Internet Route Around Damage?

Hi Daniel,

On 2023-11-29 18:27, Daniel Karrenberg wrote:
> Thanks for the great work as usual.
>
> Would it be possible to extend it by looking at measurements other than traceroute that could get us even better insights into what proportion of packets did not get there and how quick the rerouting happened. I assume that adding other measurement types would significantly increase the number of data points and the time granularity.

Thanks for the suggestion. For the error-rate part the analysis doesn't 
need traceroute, so anything that measures end-to-end between the 
selected source/destination pairs can indeed be used as an estimator for 
the error-rate. Most obvious would be pings that run more frequently 
than the traceroutes on RIPE Atlas typically.

kind regards,
Emile Aben
RIPE NCC

>
> To amplify: i am interested in the dark red areas here.
>
>
>
> Daniel
>
> ---
> Sent from a handheld device.
>
>> On 29. Nov 2023, at 13:54, Emile Aben <emile.aben at ripe.net> wrote:
>>
>> Dear colleagues,
>>
>> We analysed last week's AMS-IX outage from the perspective of RIPE Atlas, to shed some light on the question if the Internet routes around damage.
>>
>> Our analysis is here:
>> https://labs.ripe.net/author/emileaben/does-the-internet-route-around-damage-edition-2023/
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Emile Aben
>> RIPE NCC
>>
>> --
>>
>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/routing-wg
>>
>>