This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[mat-wg] MAT WG chair selection
- Previous message (by thread): [mat-wg] MAT WG chair selection
- Next message (by thread): [mat-wg] MAT WG chair selection
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Karrenberg
dfk at ripe.net
Wed Apr 13 10:03:24 CEST 2022
All three are good and have support. Nina has practical experience as chair. Massimo and Stephen bring different current work experience. All three are known to support new ideas. This will be a good chair team with both experience and potential. They will be good for the WG. I wager that the number of chairs might naturally reduce again as time progresses. Let’s have all three of them for now. Daniel --- Sent from a handheld device. > On 13. Apr 2022, at 02:21, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote: > > >> >> (3) At least one question as to why and whether we can’t have three >> chairs (which we can). > > will more members make the group more informative and productive, ow is > it just a social 'compromise' and next time we'll have four ot five? >
- Previous message (by thread): [mat-wg] MAT WG chair selection
- Next message (by thread): [mat-wg] MAT WG chair selection
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ mat-wg Archives ]