This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[mat-wg] Fwd: MAT WG chair selection

Previous message (by thread): [mat-wg] Fwd: MAT WG chair selection
Next message (by thread): [mat-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Detecting DNS Root Manipulation

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Luuk Hendriks luuk at nlnetlabs.nl
Wed Apr 6 09:16:53 CEST 2022

Hi Brian, all,

On Mon  4 Apr 2022, 12:00, Brian Trammell (RIPE) wrote:
> > (As chair, running the consensus process) No, there is no reason not
> > to go with three co-chairs for the next term; indeed (as a chair,
> > stepping down, who has had fun with meeting logistics, and is an SRE
> > at $dayjob) three chairs would in some ways be preferable, as it
> > gives n+1 chair redundancy in addition to a breadth of perspective
> > on measurement topics.

Agreed, especially on your last point. And in that case (just to be
explicit): +1 for both Massimo and Stephen.


Thanks,
 luuk

Previous message (by thread): [mat-wg] Fwd: MAT WG chair selection
Next message (by thread): [mat-wg] New on RIPE Labs: Detecting DNS Root Manipulation

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ mat-wg Archives ]