This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/mat-wg@ripe.net/
[mat-wg] followup question from MAT-WG presentation on
- Previous message (by thread): [mat-wg] followup question from MAT-WG presentation on
- Next message (by thread): [mat-wg] followup question from MAT-WG presentation on
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Benno Overeinder
benno at NLnetLabs.nl
Wed Oct 28 17:26:04 CET 2020
> On 28 Oct 2020, at 17:02, Brian Trammell (RIPE) <ietf+ripe at trammell.ch> wrote: > > hi Raffaele, > > Due to time restrictions, we missed the following question from your MAT WG presentation today, for discussion on the list: > > "Do you think UDP-O will be successfully deployed in the future? Think of the sctp protocol and how multipath-tcp learned from the deployment barriers." > Also considering the failure in the adoption of the SCTP protocol by middleboxes dropping traffic with a new (unknown to them) transport. Multipath TCP learned from this, and in the Multipath TCP architecture, the design team retrofitted the multiple streams into independent TCP streams, just like regular TCP. See also the overview paper by Christoph Paasch and Olivier Bonaventure, Multipath TCP: Decoupled from IP, TCP is at last able to support multihomed hosts, ACM Queue, vol. 12, no. 2, March 2014. (https://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=2591369) Cheers, — Benno -- Benno J. Overeinder NLnet Labs https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/
- Previous message (by thread): [mat-wg] followup question from MAT-WG presentation on
- Next message (by thread): [mat-wg] followup question from MAT-WG presentation on
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ mat-wg Archives ]