This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[mat-wg] [atlas] Spoofing the source IP address from a probe?
- Previous message (by thread): [mat-wg] [atlas] Spoofing the source IP address from a probe?
- Next message (by thread): [mat-wg] RIPE Atlas maintenance on Tuesday, 6 August
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alex Saroyan
alexsaroyan at gmail.com
Tue Jul 30 08:34:13 CEST 2013
Hi, Probably we don't need to spoof all address space, instead only if spoofing enabled just spoof to some predefined address range. Regards. /Alex Sanjeev Gupta <ghane0 at gmail.com> wrote: >On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote: > >> I support this point of view. I think controlled (anti-)spoofing >> measurements performed by the RIPE NCC with the consent of >> participating probes would be a good service to the community. > >perhaps the probe owners are not the only parties with skin in the game >and whose consent would be relevant? > > >Exactly. I host probes, and since you are spoofing others, we need to ask them. > >How you do this is left as an exercise to the reader. > >-- >Sanjeev Gupta >+65 98551208 http://www.linkedin.com/in/ghane > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/mat-wg/attachments/20130730/ad12b6b6/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [mat-wg] [atlas] Spoofing the source IP address from a probe?
- Next message (by thread): [mat-wg] RIPE Atlas maintenance on Tuesday, 6 August
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ mat-wg Archives ]