This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[mat-wg] [atlas] Proposing more public RIPE Atlas data and clarifying the current situation

• Previous message (by thread): [mat-wg] [atlas] Proposing more public RIPE Atlas data and clarifying the current situation
• Next message (by thread): [mat-wg] [atlas] Proposing more public RIPE Atlas data and clarifying the current situation

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Stephane Bortzmeyer bortzmeyer at nic.fr
Mon Dec 23 17:18:11 CET 2013

On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 02:15:17PM +0100,
 Lars-Johan Liman <liman at netnod.se> wrote 
 a message of 31 lines which said:

> ... and I would add that I don't want DDoS culprits to be able to
> use Atlas as a real-time assessment tool of the effectiveness of
> their attacks.

I do not see the relationship between this requirment and the
discussion about the proposed new policy. If I run a dDoS, I can run
the Atlas tests too (there is not process to filter out the bad
guys...), I would not rely on other people's measurements.

• Previous message (by thread): [mat-wg] [atlas] Proposing more public RIPE Atlas data and clarifying the current situation
• Next message (by thread): [mat-wg] [atlas] Proposing more public RIPE Atlas data and clarifying the current situation

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ mat-wg Archives ]