This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[mat-wg] [atlas] Proposing more public RIPE Atlas data and clarifying the current situation
- Previous message (by thread): [mat-wg] Proposing more public RIPE Atlas data and clarifying the current situation
- Next message (by thread): [mat-wg] [atlas] Proposing more public RIPE Atlas data and clarifying the current situation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bajpai, Vaibhav
v.bajpai at jacobs-university.de
Tue Dec 17 12:43:56 CET 2013
On 17 Dec 2013, at 12:23, Vesna Manojlovic <BECHA at ripe.net> wrote: > Dear colleagues, > > Sharing information about Internet performance is at the heart of collaborative efforts such as RIPE Atlas. > > Most of the RIPE Atlas probes and RIPE Atlas measurements are already public, and we'd now like to suggest > opening up the publication of RIPE Atlas data further. We also want to clarify exactly what is and isn’t > public in the current system. We describe this in more detail in this RIPE Labs article, where we also ask > for community feedback about our suggested plan to move forward: > https://labs.ripe.net/Members/becha/proposing-making-ripe-atlas-data-more-public [...] > > We look forward to your feedback and comments on the MAT Working Group Mailing List. Hello, Thanks for the initiative. I support this. Additionally, would it be possible to open the built-in measurements of public probes? (via REST API) Suppose, I am interested in analysing the latency to k.root-servers.net from probes X (public) and Y (public) specifically. I have 3 options: a) Search a UDM that is running this measurement on probe X and Y, and download that JSON data. b) Run my own UDM using probe X and Y. c) Fetch the RIPE’s in-built ping4 and ping6 measurements to k.root-servers.net for X and Y. a) is tedious. b) is what I would do now, however it not only consumes my credit, but also puts measurement load on X and Y, even though X and Y are already running this through RIPE’s in-built measurement. In addition, the timeline of your in-built measurement will be much richer than what I can achieve through a UDM. It would be great if I could make a REST call to fetch the richer dataset in c) Best, Vaibhav ----------------------------------------------------- Vaibhav Bajpai Research I, Room 86 Computer Networks and Distributed Systems (CNDS) Lab School of Engineering and Sciences Jacobs University Bremen, Germany www.vaibhavbajpai.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 496 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: </ripe/mail/archives/mat-wg/attachments/20131217/1d0f42fc/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [mat-wg] Proposing more public RIPE Atlas data and clarifying the current situation
- Next message (by thread): [mat-wg] [atlas] Proposing more public RIPE Atlas data and clarifying the current situation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ mat-wg Archives ]