This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
Spam and junk to [mat-wg] list.
- Previous message (by thread): Spam and junk to [mat-wg] list.
- Next message (by thread): [mat-wg] MAT Working Group Mailing List Settings
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ian Meikle
imeikle at gmail.com
Tue May 31 18:43:32 CEST 2011
On 31 May 2011 14:50, Daniel Karrenberg <daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net> wrote: > On 31.05 14:13, Andy Davidson wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Gert Doering wrote: > > > Over in the address policy WG, we just unsubscribe everyone who sends > back > > > autoreplies to mailing list articles. Works wonders. > > > > That wont work on mat-wg, Gert, because Daniel changed the list > configuration to let anybody (even unsubscribed addresses) post. The wg was > not consulted first. :-( > > > Andy, > > I usually do not respond to threads like this because doing so further > reduces S/N. My mail filter mostly suppresses such messages anyway. > However since you decided to move an already off-topic and only > marginally useful debate to the personal level I need to respond: > > The change intended to lower the barrier for feedback about our tools to > this list. The rationale: it is quite counter-productive to ask people > to provide feedback and then bounce it immediately requiring them to > subscribe to a mailing list. > > I notified the WG chairs about this and they agreed to it. All this was > done in prep for the RIPE meeting on very short notice. We will take > more time for such changes in the future. > > My co-chairs and I have been discussing this and we would like to clarify the conditions under which we agreed to the opening up of the list. As Daniel says, this was done at very short notice. Marketing materials using the list as the communication channel for the ideas generated by the Measurement BoF had already been printed for distribution at the meeting. Under the circumstances we felt it would be wrong of us to stand in the way of what could be useful and productive discussions, but we did register our concern at the way in which it the decision at been arrived at. Ian > > Maybe this can be fixed and lessons learned ? > > What fix do you propose? How would that fix have prevented the messages > concerned? How would that fix provide a low threshold for feedback > about tools to this list? > > Daniel > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/mat-wg/attachments/20110531/6509ea61/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): Spam and junk to [mat-wg] list.
- Next message (by thread): [mat-wg] MAT Working Group Mailing List Settings
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ mat-wg Archives ]