This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/mat-wg@ripe.net/
[mat-wg] suggestions for atlas service
- Previous message (by thread): [mat-wg] suggestions for atlas service
- Next message (by thread): [mat-wg] suggestions for atlas service
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Piotr Strzyzewski
Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
Wed May 18 11:43:18 CEST 2011
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 11:56:01AM +0200, Robert Kisteleki wrote: > > 2. Better probe location display. Currently I host two probes, both 10cm > > one from each other, put into two different ASes. When I have put > > exactly the same geo data, the "display" mechanism put one of it onto > > the other one. > > This is a tricky one. > > Background information: we'd rather not publish the exact geo-coordinates > the hosts put in, because of privacy concerns. So what we do now is that > whenever we display probes on a map, we round the geo-coordinates to two > digits. This introduces a "random" error of up to 1000 meters or so. (If you > zoom in on Amsterdam, where we have enough probes, you'll see that all > probes are aligned into a neat, sparse matrix; it's because of this.) It seems to be relatively easy to round the geo-coordinates to two digits (as you do it right now) and then add some random number from 0.00000 to 0.00999 to it. Piotr -- gucio -> Piotr Strzyżewski E-mail: Piotr.Strzyzewski at polsl.pl
- Previous message (by thread): [mat-wg] suggestions for atlas service
- Next message (by thread): [mat-wg] suggestions for atlas service
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ mat-wg Archives ]