<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 5.5.2653.12">
<TITLE>Re: [lir-wg] Reserved addresses</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>>In a current project a number of addresses is needed for closed IP </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>>communication between a number of institutions.</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>That is an internetwork, often called an internet. The Internet Protocol </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>(IP) was invented specifically for this purpose.</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>>The logical choice for</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>>this is some RFC1918-space, but certain people fear that no matter what</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>>1918-addresses we may choose they may be in use internally in the </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>involved</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>>networks and thus unavailable to this project.</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Those people are right. The logical choice for IP addresses on an internet </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>is to use addresses from the RIR. It doesn't matter whether this internet </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>is connected to the Internet or not.</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>>Someone else, however, picked up on the fact that there's a large number</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>>of addresses just marked "reserved" by IANA, and they probably are not in</FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>>use, so why don't we just grab e.g. 82.0.0.0/8?</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Because all of the organizations in your internet will also be connected </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>to the Internet as well. When the 82/8 space starts to be used on the </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>Internet, each organization will have to deal with routing and/or </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>reachability issues in their internal networks. </FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>In order to avoid this kind of mess, the IETF set up the IANA so that </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>organizations building TCP/IP networks could register for globally unique </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>IP addresses. Even though the mechanisms have changed since then (CIDR and </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>the RIRs) the basic principle still holds. There is no requirement that an </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>organization must allow everyone to access their network in order to </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>justify globally registered IP space.</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>It is better for you to register the number of addresses that you actually </FONT>
<BR><FONT SIZE=2>need rather than hijack the entire 82/8 range.</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=2>-- Michael Dillon</FONT>
</P>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<P><B><FONT SIZE=2>#***************************************************************************</FONT></B>
<BR><B><FONT SIZE=2># </FONT></B>
<BR><B><FONT SIZE=2># Dit e-mailbericht met eventuele attachments is uitsluitend bestemd voor de</FONT></B>
<BR><B><FONT SIZE=2># geadresseerde(n) en bevat mogelijk vertrouwelijke gegevens en/of is</FONT></B>
<BR><B><FONT SIZE=2># beschermd door intellectuele eigendomsrechten. Bent u niet de</FONT></B>
<BR><B><FONT SIZE=2># geadresseerde, neemt u dan zo spoedig mogelijk contact op met de afzender</FONT></B>
<BR><B><FONT SIZE=2># en verzoeken wij u het e-mailbericht en eventuele attachments van uw</FONT></B>
<BR><B><FONT SIZE=2># computer te verwijderen. Elk gebruik van de inhoud van dit e-mailbericht</FONT></B>
<BR><B><FONT SIZE=2># en eventuele attachments (waaronder verveelvoudiging, verspreiding of het</FONT></B>
<BR><B><FONT SIZE=2># anderzins openbaar maken in welke vorm dan ook) door andere personen dan</FONT></B>
<BR><B><FONT SIZE=2># de bedoelde geadresseerden is verboden. De weergegeven mening is puur</FONT></B>
<BR><B><FONT SIZE=2># persoonlijk en hoeft niet noodzakelijk over een te komen met die van</FONT></B>
<BR><B><FONT SIZE=2># Enertel. Enertel is niet aansprakelijk voor de inhoud van dit</FONT></B>
<BR><B><FONT SIZE=2># e-mailbericht en eventuele attachments.</FONT></B>
</P>
<BR>
</BODY>
</HTML>