[lir-wg] Discussion about RIPE-261

>  [ ] continue the IANA->RIR->LIR allocation as it is now

No.

>  [ ] accept RIPE-261

Yes.

>  [ ] allocate bigger chunks IANA->RIR (/8 ?) and inside those chunks,
>      use a binary chop algorithm similar to the one described in 
> RIPE-261

Yes.

>  [ ] go for a full multi-level regional distribution, down to
>      "one /32 per LIR per country" (as detailed by Michael Py)

No.

> I do like a good rant as much as anybody else, but "BGP is broken" and
> "you don't understand the way the Internet will work in 10 years" will 
> not
> really help us *get there*.  So please try to confine the discussion to
> this topic, and try to get consensus how to move on.

Agreed. The flaws of IPv6 comes down to not solving the 
multihomign/routing scaling/world starvation problem. That is an IETF 
problem, and there is a WG for it.  (Ok, so I took the opportunity to 
do some marketing).

- kurtis -