[ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Re: [lir-wg] IXP networks routing

>> here are a number of people
>> who will tell you that this won't scale and break a number of
>> applications.
>
> Since I proposed it in April 2000, no one told me that this won't
> scale.

That surprises me. Then again I wasn't aware of you draft until you 
mailed it here. What WG do see this under? I will comment to multi6 
anyway...

>>> There already is running code of of 8+8, transport over it, such
>>> as TCP, and applications over it, such as TCP multihomed telephony
>>> with no address reselection latency, that there is not much work
>>> remaning.
>>
>>> Never mention poor GSE. It is a poor idea useless for any purpose.
>>>
>> Uh, what is the difference between 8+8 and GSE?
>
> Current IPv6, in a sense, is 8+8 and was 10+6.

???? you mean the IID being 8 and the rest the other 8? I don't agree...

> GSE is a poor variation of 8+8. GSE is poor because it is an attempt
> to make ISP operation more complex (that is, less scalable), which
> has been the tradition of telephone companies to maximize their
> revenue.
>
I fail to see what GSE, 8+8 or anything have to do with telephone 
companies.

- kurtis -