[ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Re: [lir-wg] IXP networks routing
Peter Galbavy peter.galbavy at knowtion.net
Tue Mar 4 10:00:37 CET 2003
Gert Doering wrote: > Right now, the global IPv6 policy has no provisions at all for PI > assignments. This could be changed, of course, if we ("the RIPE > policy making community") agree that this is a desireable goal. As I *personally* see IPv6 as a dead duck (sorry all those who put work into it, but opinions are opinions) - so this matters little to me. > Let me ask you a question, though. What good is non-routeable PI > (except for the IXP peering mesh)? So what good is it to have a > policy that > hands out PI without caring for routing? Cough. Lucky I finished my coffee, else it might be mesy here. PRIVATE INTERCONNECTS. Real world example follows, which is why my primary employer has a PI assignment; we interconnect using IPsec VPNs and some leased lines with a number of other enterprises. We use RFC1918 *internally* and so do many others. What addressing scheme would you suggest we use to talk, especially as we DO NOT want this traffic to accidentally leak onto the public internet ? While I do not believe IPv6 will ever happen, *my* opinion I don't want to discuss it, if I get it wrong and it does, how will you achieve that same thing ? Peter
[ lir-wg Archives ]