[lir-wg] should aut-num object for IPv4 & IPv6 be the same?

we have 'inet6num' objects separate to 'inetnum' to distinguish IPv6 address
assignments from IPv4.

Is the question should different 'peering-set' 'route' objects etc reflect
different peerings for IPv6 from IPv4 that an assigned AS can have? This
scenario is real as I can easily give a current (enterprise LIR) example.

Regards,

Adrian F Pauling
BT Ignite Solutions