[lir-wg] Action from RIPE 42: Sub-Allocations revisited

Hi,

On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 03:30:40PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
> [Sub-Allocations]
>
> In the last months, I've heard a few comments from different sides that 
> "hmm, yes, this could be exactly what we need".  Also, APNIC is working 
> on a similar proposal for their community.

>From what I hear, APNIC has now accepted this as new policy.

http://www.apnic.org/meetings/14/sigs/policy/docs/addrpol-pres-apnic-downstreamallocs.ppt

I haven't looked at the powerpoint slides myself yet (no windows here),
but want to forward it anyway, to spread the information about what other
regions do...

The number of comments I have received so far are pretty few (two 
persons!) - does this mean the rest of you doesn't care either way, or
do we have consensus that this is "fine", no need to discuss?

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  46812 (46611)

SpaceNet AG                 Mail: netmaster at Space.Net
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14   Tel : +49-89-32356-0
80807 Muenchen              Fax : +49-89-32356-299