[lir-wg] Static IP addresses
Gert Doering gert at space.net
Thu Oct 3 16:12:28 CEST 2002
Hi, On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 11:23:16AM +0200, Berislav Todorovic wrote: > >From the RIPE policy perspective, ADSL is sitting in the vacuum > between dial-in (needing dynamically assigned addresses) and leased > line access (where static addresses are justifiable). ADSL is, in > fact, an "always on" kind of service and thus usage of statically > assigned IP addresses is justified (see ripe-234 - section 5.2.2). Just to clarify this. Dial-In does NOT NEED TO USE dynamic IP addresses. Neither does cable modem. The "issue" about dial-in customers is just that ISPs are usually unwilling to enter all their individual IP assignments into the RIPE database, and so it's much easier to go down the dynamic dial-in route. >From the RIPE policy standpoint, there is NO difference between dial-in, ADSL, cable, leased lines, and whatever technologies people use to hook up to the net. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 47686 (47095) SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0 80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-299
[ lir-wg Archives ]