[lir-wg] JF-spam

problem with this idea is that JF doesn't always use those
terms in his other non-relavant emails.   JF simply is abusing
the entire process and should have his posting privs revoked
completely.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: lir-wg-admin at ripe.net [mailto:lir-wg-admin at ripe.net] On 
> Behalf Of Aleksi Suhonen
> Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 9:10 PM
> To: lir-wg at ripe.net
> Subject: Re: [lir-wg] JF-spam
> 
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Quote from Neil J. McRae:
> } > As a member of the RIPE community I'd like to formally
> } > ask the chairpeople of the LIR-WG to remove Jim Flemings 
> } > subscription to this list [and anyother RIPE lists].
> 
> Quote from Gert Doering:
> } I have for a long time argued for "the RIPE lists have to 
> be *open*", } but I want to second Neil's request now.  Jim 
> Fleming is not listening, } and just disturbing the open processes.
> 
> I already privately suggested this to Hans, but I thought I 
> might as well suggest it publicly:
> 
> The RIPE lists already use some sort of a spam assassin to 
> keep clean. Instead of trying to ban the said entity from the 
> list, the phrases "ipv8" and "ipv16" should be added to the 
> list of definitive spam words in the spam filter. They are 
> not relevant with what RIPE is meant to oversee the same way 
> sex, drugs and rock'n'roll aren't.
> 
> That way, if the said entity ever wants to make a worth-while 
> contribution nothing will prevent it, and our high goals of 
> openness can still be met.
> 
> --
> 	Aleksi Suhonen / Axu TM Oy
>