[lir-wg] 50% increase in RIPE fees ? Since when ?

Could we also get RIPE to give out a SLA I would be all for it...:)

- kurtis -

On måndag, nov 25, 2002, at 16:31 Europe/Stockholm, Andrius 
Kasparavicius wrote:

> Maybe ripe customers should pay per service, not per membership 
> status. For every
> IP allocation(depends on size, work needed), for every ASn, and oth.?
>
> Andrius
>
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 03:27:14PM -0000, Peter Galbavy wrote:
>>> I am equally concerned of the rise in fees (although I have been 
>>> aware it
>>> was coming) which I don't see as bringing me anything more value. 
>>> However,
>>> other than mentioning it on the survey that recently took place, I 
>>> haven't
>>> had the time to get involved in more detail with RIPE. It looks like 
>>> I
>>> will have to in future.
>>
>> For those of us (I am sure it is not just me) supporting legacy 
>> networks, is
>> there any value in pursueing 'merging' LIRs, or does this process 
>> have a
>> detrimental effect on allocations/assignments already made ? Again, I 
>> have
>> not had the time to keep up with the latest documents re merges and
>> acquisitions and RIPE.
>>
>> This may be a cost saving for those who are paying almost completely 
>> out of
>> our own pockets.
>>
>> Peter
>>