neutrality and nat

> I seriously think that adding a second question "have you
> considered IPv6" (if only to raise awareness "IPv6 is here to
> stay") might be a good thing.

while i might agree on philosophical grounds, i am trying to run v6
and it is not clear to me it is even 'here' let alone to stay.  and
certainly, there is no non-nat transition plan.  and even a natted
transition plan, in which hosts are not 'restricted' as in v4 nat,
needs as many v4 addresses as a non-natted v4 network.

v6 needs a lot of work.  and i don't think we will have social fun
agreeing on the caveats we would be obliged to put into a "you may
want to consider" clause.

randy